Responsive Ad Slot

.

Religion

Coding

Global

Tech

Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts

Prayer for Children: Obligatory or Compulsion?

Posted on Friday, 21 August 2015 with No comments

The Muslim prayer, also called Salat or Namaz, is obligatory in Islam. Muslims pray five times in a day, which has been made irremissible and unpardonable. 

Pillar of Islam: 

Salat is one of the main "five pillars" of Islam. While Muslims are to be awarded for offering prayers, missing prayer would lead to incur God's wrath upon them, and the punishment is emplacement in Hell. In my childhood, I was always stories about severe punishments for abandoning or neglecting the 'prayer'. :Like, someone who misses the Asr (Third Prayer of the day) is as if he has been robbed of his family and his wealth. There are several stories associated with leaving prayers and are meant to inflict pain onto the mind. 

Prayer for Children



Children in the Islamic Communities are told and taught to offer prayer, and this act is encouraged by narrating stories of hell-fire in case they'd miss prayer and other shuddery bullshit: Allah, the sadist God, pours fire with embers upon the ones who leave prayer; children are no exception.

Indoctrination: 

From the time children are very young, Islam like all other religions is instilled in the young, tender minds of children. It is the result of this indoctrination that children are not able to scrutinize and think objectively when they grow up; rather, they become extremists who seek to defend their religion and faith by cursing. swearing and threat-calling the ones who expose religion rationally.
The worst case scenario is they join Terrorist organizations that train them to annihilate people who oppose their ideas - the iconoclasts, atheists, agnostics and the like have no place in the world in their unsightly view of the world. Their perspectives have no shred of humanity for people holding opposing views. 

Islam urges parents to teach the young children its Prayer (The Salat) when the child is seven of age. At age ten, the Islamic Law constitutes physically forcing, even beating the child to offer prayer. 
In other words, parents may legally resort to hit their children in aspects related to prayer. 
Islam, as reported by Muslims themselves, offers freedom of volition, discretion and freewill. In the case of Prayer, all that becomes invalid and nullifies the freedom of actions, and free discretion becomes violable, causing to incur Allah's rage which would inflict punishment on the Muslims for having disobeyed his commandments.

I have a problem with the whole case of prayer. Salat demands subjugation of freewill and prostration to the supposedly Almighty God, and it represents subservience of a person to Allah. Where the heck is freewill in that? If a person is supposed to prostrate and lay down/bow down before him without considering his own willingness, as it is made obligatory by the religion, the person has no say in the matter at all. He is just doing the bidding of his God, which is subjugation, and not discretion. 
Children have young, immature minds and do what they're told, believe what they're taught. If children were taught to reason, the world would be better and there would be more intelligent people rather than belligerent assholes.

The not-so-free-to-act religion Islam offers no freedom of will; it is just delusional to think it does. And the obligatory prayer is a compulsion on children. A child will learn what he is taught; he will learn to offer prayer, not because he has freewill in choosing to offer prayer, but only because the religion demands prayer offering unquestionably and uncritically. 
It's high time people realized that prayer is a compulsion, a forceful obligation and there is a story of eternal punishment in hell associated to instruct people better. People lose the ability to think clearly in the face of fear, and thus, they "choose" to be suppressed rather than coming out in the open and facing truth.

Children should be taught to reason first, before holding any faiths or convictions. They should have freewill to choose for themselves. The world would progress faster if people just realize the importance of freewill and coexistence.
READ MORE

Why call him God?

Posted on Sunday, 2 August 2015 with No comments
Epicurus was an ancient Greek philosopher who founded the school of philosophy, "Epicureanism". 
He was a great thinker, and audacious to question the stereotypes and dogmas of his time. He even questioned God in a quaint manner.  
Theists and believers of God proudly claim that God is omnipresent, omnipotent, and omniscient. 
Epicurus posed mind-boggling questions about omnipotency of God.

Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?

If God exists, and is willing to prevent evil, then what is stopping the omnipotent deity from exacting his duty on lowly humans. Does God require means to destroy evil; but that would be self-contradictory. Is God powerless or unable to purge evil from this world? If that is the case, God is certainly not omnipotent.

Is God able, but not willing? 

Granted God is omnipotent, and rules over everything under the sun - being the Creator, Designer and all, could it be He is not willing to prevent if not eradicate evil? If God himself isn't willing to pulverize evil, then He truly is menacing and malevolent. Anyone who has power and wants to do something, can easily do the part. When you see something bad, you must do something: this is common intuition. An adult cannot stand by watching a child being slaughtered, unless he is a maniac.
What God who calls himself merciful would want to see his creation in tatters? Only a sadist would enjoy the unsightly sight.

Is God both able, and willing?

Wait, then why isn't there any action? Could it be our sadist God loves delirious sabotage? Given that God can and wants to dispose of evil and malign in this world, then why is there so much evil in the world? If a supreme deity, that is God, controls the worldly affairs from his all-high Throne, why don't we see any observable or empirical results of his divine power? Simply, because God does not exist and all claims to his existence are groundless fairy tales - a load of crap.

Is God neither able, nor willing?

This one is pretty self-explanatory. If God has no divine power, nor does He want to obliterate evil, there is ultimately no reason to call such useless deity a God. 
READ MORE

Islam has nothing to do with REAL Islam!

Posted on Friday, 31 July 2015 with No comments

When Muslims are posed questions and asked to give rational answers, they start rambling and justify by saying 'it has nothing to do with real Islam.  
Observations from Muslims' ideas and beliefs show that:
  • Muslim actions and practices have nothing to do with real Islam
  • Terrorists have nothing to do with real Islam
  • Daesh (Muslim Terrorist Organization) have nothing to do with real Islam
  • Taliban have nothing to do with real Islam
  • The traditions and narrations mentioned in the Ahadith(احادیث - sayings of Muhammad) have nothing to do with real Islam
  • History of Islam has nothing to do with real Islam
  • Books of Biography (Islamic) have nothing to do with real Islam
  • Tafasir (Interpretations of Quran by Islamic Scholars) have nothing to do with real Islam
  • Muslim countries have nothing to do with real Islam
  • Fiqh has nothing to do with real Islam
  • Maulvis have nothing to do with real Islam
  • Sunnis have nothing to do with real Islam
  • Wahabis have nothing to do with real Islam
  • Shias have nothing to do with real Islam
  • Quranists have nothing to do with real Islam
  • Rejectors of Ahadith (people who deny Ahadith) have nothing to do with real Islam
[Note: Sunni, Wahabi, and Shia are sects of Islam and Muslim community worldwide; Maulvis are Muslim leaders i.e. clergymen of Islam. Fiqh is Islamic jurisprudence. For more info, you may visit Wikipedia]

It seems Islam itself has got nothing to do with REAL Islam! Splendid!
READ MORE

Islam is in Danger

Posted on with No comments

Islam is a pestering religion and behaves like a cranky cat. 
Everything is a danger to Islam. Muslims had better do something about it, or the ship of Islam will certainly drown into the deepest of seas. Let's hope Islam plunges into eternal darkness without any mote of hope for its convalescence, may it fall into a murky abyss. 

Islam is in Danger


  • Islam is in danger from Jews
  • Islam is in danger from Christians
  • Islam is in danger from Hindus
  • Islam is in danger from Magi
  • Islam is in danger from Atheists
  • Islam is in danger from Ahadith(sayings of Muhammad) [احادیث]
  • Islam is in danger from History
  • Islam is in danger from Biography
  • Islam is in danger from America
  • Islam is in danger from Europe
  • Islam is in danger from India
  • Islam is in danger from Secularism
  • Islam is in danger from Democracy
  • Islam is in danger from Facebook
  • Islam is in danger from Muslims
  • Islam is in danger from Disbelievers
  • Islam is in danger from Satan
  • Islam is in danger from Vampires
  • Islam is in danger from Styx and Griffins 
  • Islam is in danger from Headless Horsemen and every other supernatural creature
  • Islam is in danger from other religions
  • Islam is in danger from Forums and Groups
  • Islam is in danger from Debates
  • Islam is in danger from Freethinkers
It would appear Islam is in danger from Islam itself
Everything (that is not a part of Islam) is a danger to Islam. Curse this gruesome religion which is danger from literally everything under the sun. 




READ MORE

Atheism

Posted on Wednesday, 29 July 2015 with No comments

Many people seem to act as if they knew everything about atheism, many others call it a 'religion'. While there is an incremental multitude of people who have their own opinions about atheism, it is a fallacy to associate atheism with any religion or faith.

Misconceptions about Atheism

Some common misconceptions about atheism are given below, and these are a result of either ignorance or lack of knowledge:
1. Atheism is a religion.
2. Atheism has no morals or ethics
3. Atheists don't think properly. (Well at least they don't think the way people, mostly theists, want them to)
4. Atheists don't use brains.
5. Atheists are confused/need guidance.
This is a never ending list of misconceptions sprouting from carelessness and cognitive dishonesty. There is a handful of hard-headed people who refuse to admit when they are wrong. When free thinkers (including atheists) ask simple questions about their respective religion, they show abrupt belligerence or start refuting facts. There is also another approach the moderate ones use: justifying everything. This justification is nothing but a failed attempt of factual subterfuge.

What is Atheism?

Atheism is simply a lack of belief. It is lack of faith in existence of Gods. Atheists don't believe in existence of any God - they deny God's existence. 
The word 'Atheism' consists of two parts
  1. "a-"
  2. "theos"
Both these words root from Greek: "a" meaning "without" and theos meaning "God"
God may include a deity from the Abrahamic God, Roman Gods, Flying Spaghetti Monster (FSM), or any other deity from both monotheistic and polytheistic religions and cults. 

Atheism is complete denial in belief 


Atheists do not follow any religion or sect, let alone other faiths. Associating atheism with belief is just a fallacious misconception. 
"There is no God" is the final verdict of atheists, simple as that. 
There is either the existence of one thing, or no existence which makes it an 'absence'.  
Some people have faith, they have religion: existence of belief.
Atheists don't particularly have any faith in supernatural deities and beings: absence of belief 
There is light, or no light. Dark is just the absence of light. Similarly, atheism is 'lack of belief in God'. This is not to construe atheism as being dark, religion being the light, or vice versa. This was a simple analogy to help understand, while theists always use this analogy with a bigger form to prove God's existence. That other matter will be discussed in other posts.

Atheism is not a religion

As I've just explained, Atheism is no religion, it is far from being a religion. Some people are in a fix while trying to understand atheism. So they end up deeming it a religion. Religion requires one to have unshakeable, unwavering faith/conviction/belief (whatever you name it). On the contrary, Atheism requires nothing of you. Atheism is not a belief system, but only a lack of that belief system; people who share this thought are termed as atheists. This does not make it any religion.

Atheism and Thought

Rational thought is the basis of atheism. Atheists think harder and harder to seek out the truth. Atheists are certainly not gullible to have delusional beliefs. They do their homework before refutation and research with facts in mind. The research method is the same scientific method based on "doubt". This doubt leads to thinking, observation and collection of facts while making hypotheses and speculations. Atheism requires careful contemplation and critical scrutiny to analyze facts with rationality. This immensity of thought is what unravels the most astonishing and unexpected discovery of facts(they may be wrong, they may be right), We are seekers of the truth, truth as it reveals itself. We reach out to receive our understanding of that 'reality' and truth. Atheists use their thoughts to pursue that truth, they are rich in imagination and also skeptical. Skepticism is what we all need to find out truth. Atheists and rational thinkers are never afraid to ponder and speculate, but they are very careful when it comes to distinguishing speculation from fact. 

Accepting Facts and Atheism

Atheists are never too afraid to say NO when they are wrong, or too flustered to admit they are wrong. They are skeptical about the very nature of their own facts, so precaution and carefulness is not crucial, it is indispensable. 
When facts are provided with proper evidence, atheists are convinced. But when justifications are provided in the stead, they have no choice but to refute. 
When you are supposed to say NO, you must. There is no maybe
Evidence and logical explanation would suffice when claiming something. The burden of proof lies on the one making the claim. Objectivity is a must. 
I tried to cover many aspects of atheism in a single post, but there is room for more and I consider it inappropriate to include them in this post. You are invited to ask as many questions as you like. We'll have more discussions on important subject matters. 

READ MORE

First Post

Posted on Friday, 24 July 2015 with No comments
Anyone in the future ever decides to see what the first post of this site this was


READ MORE

Popular Posts